Hello All -
Two basic questions about the attached ultra simple toe. The resolution of the movieien1 image is 1366x768. The resolution of the moviein2 image is 100x100. The moviein1 image has a dark square of 100x100 pixels along with a 10 pixel border.
When you composite the two images together, it’s clear that the 100px image is bigger (like 107px square), and the background image is displayed at the correct size.
Question 1: Why would that be?
The other issue I can’t seem to wrap my brain around is if you translate the moviein2 -590px in the x axis, (using the Transform > Translate of the composite TOP) the left edge of the image is sitting on the left edge of the background. The opposite happens if you translate x to 590. The image sits on the right edge of the image. Well, 590 + 590 + 100px (image width) = 1280px. But the input res is 1366?! Where did the extra 86 pixels go??
This seems super basic if one is looking to do pixel accurate animation.
res-example.2.toe (4.77 KB)